Skip to main content
T TON Adoption
RU
Gaming & mini-apps COMPARE · 2026

xGift vs Portals vs Tonnel vs MRKT: Gifts Marketplaces 2026

Full matrix: xGift, Portals, Tonnel, MRKT — fees, analytics, liquidity, auctions, safety. Which upgraded gifts marketplace to pick in 2026.

Author
TON Adoption Team · research desk
Published
4 min read

TL;DR. Four main secondary marketplaces for upgraded Telegram gifts in 2026: Portals (liquidity leader), xGift (best analytics), Tonnel (auctions), MRKT (lowest fees). Pick depends on style: pattern-hunter → xGift, auction sniper → Tonnel, liquidity → Portals, cheap trades → MRKT. Serious flippers use 3-4 simultaneously for arbitrage. All on TON escrow, technically equally safe; main differences are UX, analytics and fees.

Context

Upgraded Telegram gifts are NFTs on the TON blockchain issued via Telegram since 2024. By 2026 the market is formed: 50,000+ unique gifts, ~$500K-$1M daily secondary volume, four main trading venues.

All four compete for the same set of gifts. Differences — UX, trader tooling, fees, auction mechanics.

Full comparison matrix

ParameterxGiftPortalsTonnelMRKT
Launched2024202420232024
Maker fee0%0%0%0%
Taker fee5% (3% prem)5%3-5%2%
Premium subscription2-3 TON/mononenonenone
Weekly volume*$2-3M$4-6M$2-3M$0.5-1M
Analyticsdeepmediummediumbasic
Auctionsyesraredominantno
Mini App in TGyesyesyesyes
Cross-platform listingsno (TG only)TG + webTG + webTG only
TON Connectyesyesyesyes
Phishing risk (clones)highhighmediummedium

*Volumes — empirical mid-2026, fluctuate ±30-50% on market sentiment.

When to pick which

Scenario A: Active pattern-hunter

Best pick: xGift + Portals as secondary.

Why: xGift with premium subscription gives the deepest analytics (trait premium, rarity distribution, sales history, sub-floor alerts). Edge in finding underpriced gifts. Portals — for cross-checks and liquidity diversification.

Concrete play: daily scan xGift across 5-10 watchlist collections with trait filters. Find 20-30% underpriced gift — buy. Hold 2-8 weeks, sell on xGift or Portals (where floor’s higher).

Scenario B: Auction sniper

Best pick: Tonnel, with xGift for high-value lots.

Why: Tonnel is auction-native. Every other listing is auction, 5% minimum bump, 24-72 hour duration. Snipers enter in the last 5-10 minutes with small bumps.

Strategy: subscribe to auctions on watchlist collections. 30 minutes before close — estimate “true value” via other platforms, place max bid in the last 2-3 minutes. Won at < secondary floor — flip with 20-40% margin.

Scenario C: Trend / momentum trader

Best pick: Portals + xGift.

Why: Portals has the biggest volumes and reacts to momentum first. When a collection heats up, you see it here first. xGift gives volume alerts via premium subscription.

Strategy: watchlist 20-30 collections. One shows volume spike >50% over 7-day average — enter slightly above floor, ride 1-3 weeks, exit on cooling.

Scenario D: Casual buyer (1 gift/year)

Best pick: MRKT for small gifts (under 50 TON), xGift or Portals for expensive.

Why: MRKT 2% taker, for $100-500 purchase saves $2-10 vs 5% rivals. Larger purchases — the saving justifies picking by other factors (Portals liquidity, xGift analytics).

Scenario E: Cross-platform arbitrageur

Best pick: all four + watchlist each.

Why: cross-marketplace spreads regularly 10-25%. Buy cheap + list expensive = 5-15% margin after fees.

Real case: Berry Box rare variant bought on MRKT at 12 TON, sold on Portals at 18 TON. After 5% Portals taker the seller netted 17.1 TON. After 2% MRKT taker the original cost was 12.24 TON. Arbitrageur margin — ~4.86 TON minus gas = ~$23 per trade.

Detail per marketplace

Portals

Strengths:

  • Biggest liquidity mid-2026 — $4-6M/week.
  • Smooth web interface + Telegram Mini App.
  • Solid browse UI for collections.
  • Big user base (≥50,000 active).

Weaknesses:

  • Medium analytics — no trait premium, only basic rarity distribution.
  • 5% taker fee without tier options.
  • Lots of phishing clones with similar names.

Best for: buying a specific gift fast, momentum trading.

xGift

Strengths:

  • Deepest analytics among secondary venues.
  • Premium subscription with 3% taker and premium tools.
  • Volume alerts, trait filters with saved searches.
  • Built-in top-flippers leaderboard.

Weaknesses:

  • Lower liquidity than Portals.
  • Telegram-only interface (no web).
  • Phishing clones exist.

Best for: active traders, pattern-hunters, data-driven decisions.

Full review — xGift complete review.

Tonnel Network

Strengths:

  • Auction-native ecosystem — best for sniping.
  • 3% taker on some listings.
  • Long history (launched 2023, niche experience).

Weaknesses:

  • Less data than xGift.
  • Smaller fixed-price selection.
  • UI takes acclimation (auction-first).

Best for: auction snipers, price-discovery lovers.

MRKT

Strengths:

  • Lowest fees — 2% taker.
  • Clean, simple UI.
  • Less phishing (fewer clones).

Weaknesses:

  • Low liquidity ($0.5-1M/week).
  • Basic analytics.
  • No auctions.

Best for: cheap trades, casual buyers, no active trading.

Safety — equal

All 4 marketplaces use TON escrow smart contracts: seller can’t withdraw buyer’s TON without delivering the NFT. Technically equal. Mid-2026 no known losses through the contract itself.

External risk differences:

  • Phishing bots: xGift and Portals have the most clones because of popularity. Tonnel and MRKT — fewer.
  • Wash trading: everywhere; same defence (watch unique buyers, not sale count).
  • Floor spoofing: everywhere; spotted by too-good-to-be-true prices.

Final recommendation

One marketplace: Portals — liquidity leader, smooth UI, wide user base. Default if you’re just starting.

Two: Portals + xGift. Portals for liquidity, xGift for analytics and edge. Covers 80%+ of opportunities.

Three-four: add Tonnel (auctions) and MRKT (cheap + arbitrage). Full coverage, fits serious flippers.

Premium subscriptions: only xGift offers; pays off at 40+ TON/month turnover, less — skip.

One gift: check all 4 prices before buying. Spread 5-25%, savings can be material.

Taxes

Same across all 4 — property sale (NFT) on profit, 13% PIT on the spread (Russia). Keep purchase and sale tx hashes. More — Taxes on gift flipping.

Frequently asked

By trade volume (mid-2026): Portals leads with $4-6M/week, xGift and Tonnel ~$2-3M/week each, MRKT $0.5-1M/week. Collection-level leadership varies: Plush Pepe trades more on Portals, Diamond Ring more actively on xGift thanks to analytics. Serious traders monitor all 4 and pivot to where the deepest bid/ask sits right now.
Maker — 0% everywhere. Taker: MRKT 2%, Tonnel 3-5% (depends on listing), Portals 5%, xGift 5% (3% with premium subscription). Cheapest — MRKT, but liquidity is lower. xGift premium subscription (2-3 TON/month) pays off from 40 TON/month turnover. One-off trades — MRKT gives the seller the most net.
xGift, thanks to deep analytics — trait premium, rarity distribution, top flippers, price alerts. Edge in finding underpriced gifts. Portals — second-best analytics but better liquidity. Tonnel — best for auction sniping. MRKT — best for quick cheap trades. Serious flippers usually use 3-4 simultaneously for arbitrage.
Depends on the gift. Pick the specific gift you want, check 3-4 marketplaces, buy where cheapest. Cross-marketplace spread is typically 5-15%. For a one-off purchase, 5% vs 2% fee at 100 TON price = 3 TON ($15) difference — not critical, pick by UX, not fee.
All 4 marketplaces use TON escrow smart contracts — the seller can't receive TON without delivering the NFT. Technically equally safe. Gifts can be held in any TON wallet (Tonkeeper / MyTonWallet / Wallet) — they're just NFTs on the blockchain, marketplace-independent. The main safety difference is phishing bots with similar names — more on the bigger venues (xGift, Portals), less on Tonnel and MRKT.
Fragment is the official TON Foundation venue — primary issuance + secondary. Fees 5-10%, basic analytics. Often lists stuff that's not on others (or appears there first). xGift / Portals / Tonnel / MRKT are pure-secondary venues; they don't mint new collections, just trade what Telegram released via Fragment. Primary mint — Fragment; secondary trading — the other four.
Tonnel — the most auction-oriented ecosystem with history. Roughly every second listing is auction-format. xGift also supports them with lower volume. Portals — fixed-price dominates. MRKT — no auctions. Strategy of sniping at auction close — Tonnel is the #1 pick.

Related

← Back to blog