DeDust review: liquidity, interface and the DUST token in 2026
TON's second-largest DEX by volume — native AMM, pool formula, DUST token, farming. How the interface differs from STON.fi and where DeDust wins.
- Author
- TON Adoption Team · research desk
- Published
DeDust is the second-largest TON DEX by volume and the only real STON.fi competitor. If STON.fi is the “big supermarket” with the deepest liquidity, DeDust is the “specialty shop” — younger, more active in niche pairs, a touch more “engineering-driven” by design. This review is plain and hype-free: what is inside, how the interface differs, where DeDust wins.
TL;DR — what makes DeDust different
- Its own AMM factory, written for TON’s native semantics (async messages, jetton wallets).
- Two pool types — volatile (classic x*y=k) and stable (StableSwap variant for pegged pairs).
- Base pool fee — 0.20% (lower than STON.fi V1’s 0.30%).
- Launched its own DUST token in 2024 with a farming programme.
- Some niche jettons list on DeDust first — useful for discovery of rare liquidity.
DeDust TVL in H1 2026 hovers around $3–8M per DeFiLlama — clearly below STON.fi, but activity in specific pairs (especially around GameFi tokens and mini-apps) is comparable or higher.
Interface: what the eye notices
If you open ston.fi and dedust.io back to back, the difference is immediate.
STON.fi:
- many farming programme banners;
- Telegram-Web-App style, bright;
- focused on “buy any jetton” in one tap.
DeDust:
- dry, engineering layout, no animations;
- faster switching between pools and analytics;
- a built-in “pools” page with TVL and APR per pool;
- a separate Limit Orders tab — DeDust was one of the first on TON to offer limit orders via off-chain matching and on-chain settlement.
To each their own: minimalist taste — DeDust; colourful Coinbase look — STON.fi. Performance is the same.
Pool architecture
DeDust splits pools into two classes:
- Volatile pool — standard constant-product AMM. Fee 0.20% by default, factory allows up to 1% for exotic pairs. Fits any TON-jetton with normal volatility.
- Stable pool — modified StableSwap invariant. Fee 0.04% (lower because slippage is tiny). Used for USDT-USDC, stTON-TON, tsTON-TON and similar pegged pairs.
That gives DeDust a small edge in a specific segment: swapping stTON to TON directly via the stable pool is cheaper and lower-slippage than on STON.fi V1.
DUST token: what and why
DUST launched in 2024 as a farming and governance token. Distribution channels:
- LP farming — liquidity providers in active pools earned DUST on top of trading fees.
- Trade mining — short campaigns where bonus DUST went to active traders.
- Early-user airdrop — one-time TGE distribution.
Today (2026) DUST trades on DeDust itself in the DUST-TON pair. Use case — votes on new pools and fee parameters. Speculatively DUST stays high-vol like any DEX token; “buy and hold” only makes sense if you believe in long-term DEX liquidity growth on TON.
Scenarios where DeDust wins
- Staking derivatives (stTON, tsTON, hTON). Stable pool with low fee and slippage — perfect for arbitrage or exiting liquid staking back to native TON.
- GameFi tokens and niche jettons. Some teams list on DeDust first thanks to a friendlier factory and better launch UX.
- Limit orders. If you want to buy a jetton at a specific price without sitting in the order book — DeDust is one of the few options on TON.
- Pool analytics. The
/poolspage in DeDust shows APR, 24h volume and LP share — on STON.fi this data is fragmented.
Where DeDust loses
Honesty cuts both ways.
- Liquidity depth. On TON-USDT and TON-NOT (the two base pairs) STON.fi holds more TVL — the final rate on big swaps ($1000+) is often worse on DeDust.
- Marketing and recognition. Most mini-apps and Telegram bots default to the STON.fi API. The casual user simply does not stumble onto DeDust.
- Fewer farming programmes. STON.fi is more aggressive with LP incentives, which pulls more liquidity.
Step-by-step DeDust swap
- Open dedust.io, Connect Wallet via TON Connect.
- Pick a pair, e.g. TON to STON or TON to DUST.
- In the Settings dropdown set slippage: 0.5% for big pools, 1–2% for small ones.
- Verify the route (Pool Path in the expandable block) — sometimes DeDust routes through two pools.
- Confirm the transaction in your wallet. Gas ~0.1–0.2 TON.
- In 5–15 seconds the token is in your wallet. Swap history is in the dashboard and on tonscan.org.
Security notes
- TON Connect in DeDust is fully supported with Tonkeeper, MyTonWallet, Tonhub. Wallet in Telegram does not connect — it is a custodial service without on-chain signing.
- Audits. Trail of Bits and ChainSecurity audited the core contracts in 2023–2024.
- Phishing. Telegram ads keep cycling domains like dedust-io.com and dedust.app — bookmark the original dedust.io and never click referral links from DMs.
When to pick DeDust vs STON.fi
If you want a universal everyday DEX — STON.fi. If you need stable arbitrage, limit orders, a rare jetton or a niche GameFi token — DeDust. Many users keep both connected and route through whichever quotes a better rate. Detailed comparison — in the “STON.fi vs DeDust where to trade” piece.
Sources
- dedust.io — official site and dashboard.
- DeFiLlama: DeDust — historical TVL.
- docs.dedust.io — AMM and SDK docs.
- tonscan.org — transaction explorer.
Frequently asked
Is DeDust a STON.fi fork?
What is the DUST token?
Where do I find liquidity for rare jettons?
How much does a DeDust swap cost?
Is DeDust safe?
Related
- DeFiFeb 28, 2026
STON.fi vs DeDust: where to trade on TON in 2026
Comparing TON's two main DEXs by liquidity, fees, UX and security. When STON.fi wins, when DeDust wins — concrete scenarios and numbers.
- DeFiFeb 20, 2026
STON.fi 2026: TON's #1 DEX — V2 pools, fees, jettons
STON.fi explained for 2026: pools, V2 fees, jetton swap pitfalls, farming pools that actually pay. Numbers + step-by-step first swap that won't trip you up.
- DeFiMay 14, 2026
TONCO review: concentrated liquidity V3 on TON in 2026
The first concentrated-liquidity DEX on TON. Ticks and ranges explained, how to open a position, where TONCO beats STON.fi and DeDust — and where it does not.
- DeFiMay 16, 2026
STON.fi vs DeDust: TON DEX deep comparison 2026
TON DEX compared: pool depth, slippage on majors, fee structure, jetton listing, RU-IP availability, MEV protection. Practical scenario-based choices.
- DeFiMay 16, 2026
MEV on TON: Does It Exist and How to Defend in 2026
Does MEV exist on TON, how does the async message model break classic sandwich attacks, which forms of value extraction still work, and how can users defend…