Skip to main content
T TON Adoption
DeFi STRATEGY · 2026

DAOlama: 5 leverage strategies on TON NFTs with worked numbers

Practical NFT-borrowing strategies on DAOlama: leveraged flips, cross-staking, bear-market rollover, working capital and tax optimisation.

Author
TON Adoption Team · research desk
Published
6 min read

The base article on DAOlama: NFT-collateralized lending on TON covered how the protocol works. This one covers what to do with it: five concrete strategies with real numbers and the points where each one breaks. Not financial advice — pattern review. The decision to apply any of this is yours, and so is the risk of an NFT liquidation on a misjudged trade.

Strategy 1. Hold + Borrow — the safest entry

Logic: you don’t want to sell a rare NFT, but you temporarily need TON (travel, hardware, an investment into another project). Pledge the NFT for 14–30 days, receive TON, spend it, repay with interest a month later.

Numbers:

  • NFT: a Telegram Username with a 500 TON floor.
  • Loan: 200 TON (40% LTV) for 30 days at 22% APR.
  • Interest due: 200 × 0.22 × 30/365 ≈ 3.6 TON (~$15 at $4/TON).

When it works:

  • The alternative is selling and rebuying. On sale you lose 5–10% to the marketplace spread. A 30-day loan = 1.8% of the principal — cheaper if the floor doesn’t dump.
  • No capital-gains event on the NFT (jurisdiction-dependent — see Strategy 5).

When it breaks:

  • Floor drops 30%+, LTV creeps into the danger zone. Inattention = liquidation.
  • Life happens, you miss the deadline — you lose a 500 TON NFT to clear a 200 TON loan.

Mitigation: set a deadline-minus-24h alarm. Pledge at LTV ≤ 40% — that gives you room for a floor drawdown.

Strategy 2. Leveraged NFT flip — high risk

Logic: you spot an undervalued collection and want to buy N units, no cash on hand. Pledge NFT-1, buy NFT-2 from the new collection with the borrowed TON, resell after 2–4 weeks at a margin, repay the loan, pocket the difference.

Numbers (optimistic case):

  • Collateral: Anonymous Number with 800 TON floor → loan 400 TON (50% LTV) for 14 days at 30% APR.
  • Interest: 400 × 0.30 × 14/365 ≈ 4.6 TON.
  • Buy NFT-2 for 400 TON, sell 14 days later for 500 TON (floor +25%). Marketplace 5% fee = 25 TON.
  • Net profit: 500 − 25 (fee) − 400 (principal) − 4.6 (interest) ≈ 70 TON on zero of your own TON deployed.

Pessimistic case (same setup):

  • NFT-2’s floor dropped 20%. Sale after 14 days for 320 TON.
  • Net loss: 320 − 16 (fee) − 400 − 4.6 ≈ −100 TON. Your collateral NFT-1 survives only if you cover the gap out of pocket.

This is 2× leverage on the NFT portfolio. Profit and loss both double. Suitable for experienced NFT traders, not a first DeFi experiment.

Strategy 3. Cross-staking — rate arbitrage

Logic: borrow TON on DAOlama, immediately stake it via Tonstakers, capture the spread.

When it works (rarely):

  • DAOlama borrow rate: 18–25% APR on longer terms.
  • TON staking: 3–5% APR.
  • Spread: minus 15–22% — loss-making on default parameters.

When it actually works:

  • You find a DeFi pool with APR above the borrow rate. Example: a new DEX provider’s farming pool at 40–60% APY (smart-contract risk plus native-token risk).
  • $LLAMA-airdrop farming: DAOlama distributes $LLAMA for activity, and a well-timed exit through the token can unlock extra APY. That’s no longer “arbitrage”, that’s “playing incentives”.

When it breaks:

  • Farming-pool exploit = you lose the TON and still owe the loan.
  • $LLAMA dumps after the airdrop and the effective APR sits below expectations.

Realistic take: cross-staking via DAOlama only makes sense with a specific high-yield pool whose risk profile you understand. On vanilla TON staking it’s a money-loser.

Strategy 4. Bear-market rollover — psychology over math

Logic: the collection’s floor sank, you don’t want to crystallise the loss with a sale. Pledge on DAOlama → get working TON → don’t sit in drawdown, keep going. When the floor recovers, repay the loan and keep the NFT.

Numbers:

  • NFT: a NOT-gift with a 50 TON floor (down from 80 TON over a month).
  • Loan: 20 TON for 14 days at 35% APR. Interest ≈ 0.27 TON.
  • After 14 days: either the floor recovered (good) or you roll over for the next cycle (+0.27 TON of interest).

When it works:

  • Conviction in the collection’s fundamentals — this is temporary drawdown, not structural decline.
  • Willingness to pay 1–2% per month for the option on a 30–50% recovery.

When it breaks:

  • The collection keeps falling. Three rollovers in, you’ve paid 1 TON of interest and the floor sank to 20 TON — LTV above threshold, liquidation.
  • The psychological trap: instead of accepting the loss, you accumulate it through interest payments hoping for a dead-cat bounce.

Mitigation: set a hard exit: “if floor hasn’t recovered after two rollovers, I close via sale-repay and take the loss.” Without an exit plan, rollover becomes a long agony.

Strategy 5. Tax optimisation (only with jurisdiction-specific advice)

Logic: in most jurisdictions, selling an NFT at a profit is a taxable event (capital gains). A loan against an NFT is not taxable (it’s debt, not realisation). If you need liquidity now and selling at a profit is tax-inefficient, borrowing can defer the taxable event until a better moment.

Scenarios:

  • A jurisdiction with a long hold period (say 1 year for long-term gains) — borrow TON, wait for the period to roll over, then sell at the preferential rate.
  • A jurisdiction with a tax on unrealised gains (rare) — borrowing becomes less effective.

Important caveat:

  • In several jurisdictions NFT operations are still in a grey zone — there’s no clear guidance on how authorities classify NFT collateral.
  • In the EU / US the precedent is more developed; consult a tax professional.
  • This strategy is only meaningful at large position sizes (NFT portfolios of $50k+). On small balances the tax savings are smaller than the fees.

Safety checklist

Before borrowing on DAOlama, walk through this:

  • You know the exact repayment deadline and set a reminder at -24h.
  • LTV ≤ 40% — buffer for a 30% floor drawdown without liquidation.
  • A “what if floor crashes” plan is written down before the trade.
  • You actually need the loan right now — not “because I can”.
  • Collateral is an NFT from the top 3 Getgems collections by volume (not a fresh hype drop).
  • You’ve checked the pool parameters: p2p vs pool, liquidation threshold, grace period.
  • Your TON wallet is protected by 2FA / hardware (Tonkeeper + Ledger).

Wrapping up

DAOlama gives NFT holders an instrument that used to live only in OTC channels with counterparty risk. Strategies 1 (hold+borrow) and 4 (rollover with an exit plan) are relatively safe. Strategies 2 (leveraged flip) and 3 (cross-staking) require experience and an understanding of failure modes. Strategy 5 (tax) only works on serious positions and with a professional.

The most common mistake is overestimating floor stability and pledging a hype-driven NFT at high LTV. The safest scheme is a premium username at 30% LTV for 7–14 days against a clear use of the borrowed TON.

Sources

Frequently asked

The borrow rate minus the staking APR. If you borrow on DAOlama at 25% APR and stake at 4%, your spread is minus 21% — you're losing. For the math to make sense, either lower the borrow rate (short term + low LTV gives better pricing) or find a DeFi vehicle with an APR higher than your borrow rate (risk-laden pools at 30–60% on DEX farming programmes).
No. The NFT is the only collateral in the smart contract. If the floor drops and a liquidation happens, you lose the NFT — nothing else is clawed back (no margin call requiring extra deposit). That's different from crypto-margin trading, where you can go into the red.
Technically any, but economically — from 100–200 TON of floor-price collateral. Below that, network fees and the spread between borrow and reinvest eat the prospective return. For small needs (5–20 TON), use Crypto Bot P2P or a direct sale instead.
Three options: 1) repay early (some pools allow it) and exit cleanly; 2) make a partial repayment to bring LTV below the liquidation threshold; 3) accept the liquidation if the NFT is going to zero anyway. The worst thing is ignoring it and losing both the NFT and the chance to close early.
There's no direct flash-loan primitive — TON is lent as a regular fixed-term loan. But you can chain steps in one session: pledge NFT → receive TON → execute a trade → sell the asset → repay the loan. Operationally and tax-wise this is more involved than a pure EVM flash-loan.
If you borrow actively (1–2+ loans a month), the discount via $LLAMA staking pays back in a few loans. For one-off users (1–2 loans a quarter) — not worth it; the buy/sell spread on the token eats the savings. Check the current tier table in DAOlama's live docs — parameters move.

Related